Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Anthony Doyle Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Doyle R. Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical LLC and William Cook Europe APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle v. Cinemark USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00793
Defendant:
Cinemark USA, Inc. and John Doe Entities A - M
Plaintiff:
Donald Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd. et al
as 3:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Theresa Jan Michaels, Lucius Olen Crosby Gammill, Jennifer Lynn Gammill McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padgett v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doyle v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00854
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Arnault Mestres
Plaintiff:
Jessica Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beach et al v. Crace et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
TLC Rx LLC, Traci Beach and Glenn Doyle Beach, Jr.
Defendant:
Jason L. Crace and Jason L. Crace, CPA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sudduth v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2018cv00077
Petitioner:
Doyle Sudduth
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sudduth v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00186
Petitioner:
Doyle Sudduth
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Degaris et al v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brandy Degaris and Jane Doe Plaintiffs 1-12
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi, Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Cecil Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
