Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Doyle v. Supreme Court of the State of Montana
as 2:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Keith Doyle
Respondent:
Supreme Court of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle v. Supreme Court of the State of Montana
as 2:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Keith Doyle
Respondent:
Supreme Court of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tony Marvin Doyle
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle et al v. Kalispell Regional Healthcare
as 9:2019cv00208
Plaintiff:
Annette Nevidomsky and Connie Doyle
Defendant:
Kalispell Regional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vasquez v. Doyle et al
as 9:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Peter Vasquez
Defendant:
Aaron Sutton, Cody Doyle and Wade Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Fox et al
as 4:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Keith Doyle
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Mike McGrath and County Attorneys, County and Municipal Magistrates, and the State District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Fender et al
as 2:2017cv00068
Petitioner:
Keith Doyle
Respondent:
Douglas Fender and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hartsoe v. Doyle et al
as 6:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Hartsoe
Defendant:
Jay Doyle, Debra Christopher, Mike McGrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Doyle et al
as 9:2013cv00189
Petitioner:
Robert Crawford
Respondent:
Jay Doyle, Lori Thibodeau and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doyle v. Frink et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Petitioner:
Keith Doyle
Respondent:
Martin Frink and Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
