Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Bryon Champ v. Shirley Forcum, et al
as 23-3023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYON K. CHAMP
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY FORCUM, NAGESWARARAO VALLABHANENI, Doctor, M.D., Physician, WAYNE WOMAC, Coordinator, Forensic Transfer Personnal, Chester Mental Health Center and others
Anderson v. Draper et al
as 1:2023cv01343
Plaintiff:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
Lisa Draper and . Marten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
McBride v. Bane et al
as 3:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Curtis L McBride and Curtis McBride
Defendant:
Pam Bane, Cross, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baratta v. Ackert et al
as 3:2023cv50065
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Baratta
Defendant:
Jacquelyn D. Ackert and Theresa Friel-Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bentley v. Morris et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dominique Bentley
Defendant:
Carri Morris, S. Buettner, Ms. Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRAPER v. MANHEIM REMARKETING, INC. d/b/a MANHEIM INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2022cv02434
Plaintiff:
DARIAN DRAPER
Defendant:
MANHEIM REMARKETING, INC. d/b/a MANHEIM INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sutton v. Draper et al
as 1:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Randall Trevet Sutton
Defendant:
Lisa Draper, . Potts and . Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRAPER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02384
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DRAPER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sanborn v. Draper et al
as 1:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Darren E Sanborn
Defendant:
Draper, . James, Rachelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
