Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McCray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Driscoll McCray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McCray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
Driscoll McCray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pendell v. Spokane et al
as 2:2019cv00426
Defendant:
Larry H Haskell, John F Driscoll, Jr and Spokane County, Washington
Plaintiff:
Travis Pendell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Driscoll's Inc
as 2:2019cv01465
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Driscoll's Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jacobsen et al v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2016cv00298
Plaintiff:
Brian Jacobsen , Connie Jacobsen , Ryan Kildea and others
Defendant:
Mark Driscoll and John Sutton Turner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Tacey Goss P.S. v. Barnhart et al
as 2:2013cv00800
Plaintiff:
Tacey Goss P.S.
Defendant:
Donna Barnhart , Women's Health Developers Inc , Chicfit Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Boland et al v. Crosby Restoration Inc
as 2:2013mc00059
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Ken Lambert and others
Defendant:
Crosby Restoration Inc
Boland et al v. Crosby Restoration Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00039
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Ken Lambert and others
Defendant:
Crosby Restoration Inc
Garnishee:
Keybank National Association
Boland et al v. Hinshaw Masonry LLC et al
as 2:2013mc00003
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Ken Lambert and others
Defendant:
Hinshaw Masonry LLC and Advanced Masonry Services LLC
Garnishee:
Umpqua Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
