Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Walden v. The City of Duncan, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Shawn Walden
Defendant:
The City of Duncan, Oklahoma and Christian Archer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Stubbs v. USA
as 6:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
John Duncan Stubbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Coplen v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Norman Coplen
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail, Duncan Police Department, Michael Elroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Stephens County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Juan Demetrius Hill and Juan-D Hill
Defendant:
Stephens County Sheriff, Oklahoma Attorney General, Govenor Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neill et al v. Hyundai Motor America
as 5:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Erin Duncan O'Neill and Robert Eugene Craig III
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Duncan v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00536
Petitioner:
Jackie Duncan
Respondent:
FNU Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
