Cases 1 - 10 of 400
Plowman v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv04080
Plaintiff:
Steven Plowman
Defendant:
Melissa Baker, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Bommiasami Veerasikku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funk v. Rankins
as 6:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funk v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paige v. Funk et al
as 3:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Paige
Defendant:
Glenn R. Funk, Howard Gentry, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis Shuler, Jr. v. Adam Weeks, et al
as 23-5946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS SHULER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM C. WEEKS, PAUL HARRIS, JACK STANLEY and others
Carter v. Funk et al
as 3:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Eric O. Carter
Defendant:
Glenn Funk, Howard Gentry, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stewart v. Funk et al
as 3:2023cv50322
Plaintiff:
Lavertis Stewart
Defendant:
Dr. Funk, Illinois Dept. Of Corrections(IDOC), Dr. Chamberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
