Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Hickson v. Haulcy
as 24-30165
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Captain Jones and others
Isibor v. Stearns
as 1:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
Ehigie Henshaw Isibor
Respondent:
FNU Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jeremiah Hill v. Nicholas Henshaw
as 23-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH V. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS HENSHAW, Correctional Officer
Montemayor v. Tom Green County Detention
as 23-10324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steve Montemayor
Defendant / Appellee:
Tom Green County Detention Facility, Judge Penny Roberts, Lil John, Federal Agent and others
Hickson v. Haulcy et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Capt Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montemayor v Federal Judge Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00007
Defendant:
Steve Montemayor, Federal Judge Parker, Judge Federal Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Henshaw et al
as 5:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Travis Dunn
Defendant:
Danny Henshaw, Louisiana Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, David Wade Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montemayor v. Tom Green County Detention Facility et al
as 6:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Gilbert Chapoy Sr., Robert Bobby Martinez, Steve Henshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Montemayor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Cantwell et al
as 2:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Davis
Defendant:
. Cantwell, . Coffey, . Henshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery et al v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03107
Defendant:
Todd Thomason, James Colgan, (fnu) (lnu) and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Wallingford, Ramaun Johnson, John E. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
