Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Held v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Held and Brenda-Lee Held
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlson v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00082
Plaintiff:
Lance Kerry Carlson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Knox et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Kerry Yates and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Terry Knox and Carolyn "Coke" Knox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart et al v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 9:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Hart and Kerry Ellen Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanfield v. State of Montana
as 2:2012cv00045
Petitioner:
Kerry Cornelius Stanfield
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
The Hanover Insurance Company v. Hopwood et al
as 1:2012mc00004
Plaintiff:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lawrence P. Hopwood and Kerry F. Hopwood
Miessner v. Grant et al
as 2:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kerry Rex Miessner
Defendant:
Jay Grant, Gina Tracy, Nicole Bugni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henan v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kerri Henan
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miessner v. O'Fallon et al
as 9:2007cv00034
Petitioner:
Kerry Rex Miessner
Respondent:
Dan O'Fallon, Cascade County Regional Prison and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miessner v. Aramark et al
as 4:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kerry Rex Miessner
Defendant:
Aramark and Cascade County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
