Cases 11 - 20 of 12,789
COOPER v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2023cv04696
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON RANDALL COOPER
Defendant:
OLIVER, P. THOMPSON, SGT. HURL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hawkins v. Dragovich et al
as 4:2023cv01869
Plaintiff:
Nichole Hawkins
Defendant:
Martin Dragovich, Marylin Brooks, State Trooper Beth Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
as 5:2023cv04385
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
as 5:2023cv04235
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 5:2023cv04145
Plaintiff:
CHASE J WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, ABB, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv04145
Plaintiff:
CHASE J WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, ABB, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EDWARDS v. ENNIS
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
RASHAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
MAJ. ENNIS, MAJOR ENNIS, MAJOR/CAPTAIN SISSEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEEL v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2023cv03984
Petitioner:
TYREE PEEL
Respondent:
L. OLIVER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
