Cases 1 - 10 of 90
MAHAN v. MILLER et al
as 5:2023cv04021
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. MAHAN
Defendant:
ALLEN R. MILLER, JANET M. MILLER FAMILY TRUST, EDWARD T. OTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMERICAN GLASS MACHINERY, LLC v. OTT et al
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GLASS MACHINERY, LLC
Defendant:
RAY OTT doing business as ARKAUM INDUSTRIES LLC and JOHN PAVALONIS doing business as ARKAUM INDUSTRIES LLC
Horst v. Litz et al
as 1:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Dwight William Horst
Defendant:
Tina Litz, Michael Ott, Rebecca Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OTT v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN E. OTT
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Kimmel v. Doughty et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Davey James Kimmel
Defendant:
C.O. Doughty, C.O. Torres, C.O. McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Felton et al
as 3:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Shariem Houston
Defendant:
Atari Felton, Michael Ott, Claude Mease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
READER v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
RICHARD READER
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ABBIE TATE, JAMES ECKARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. v. OTT et al
as 2:2022cv01893
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Defendant:
RUTH OTT and CLEVELAND OTT & SON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
