Cases 1 - 10 of 829
Benigno Perez-Aguilar v. Jeff Howard
as 24-1340
Petitioner:
BENIGNO PEREZ-AGUILAR
Respondent:
JEFF HOWARD, Warden
Lefford et al v. Stowe et al
as 2:2024cv02117
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Mark Lefford, Maria Lefford and Mario Perez
Defendant:
Mindi Stowe and Philips North America, LLC. d/b/a Philips Health Care Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roque Perez v. A&A Staffing Solutions L.L.C et al
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jose P. Roque Perez
Defendant:
A&A Staffing Solutions L.L.C and Waleska Chavez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sisson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Sisson and David J. Perez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carl Puckett, et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 24-5282
Plaintiff:
CARL PUCKETT and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Davison v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Davison
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Cielo Rodriguez, Mallory Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez et al v. Kami Ramen Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02189
Plaintiff:
Nallely Dominguez and Marcelino Perez
Defendant:
Kami Ramen Group Inc. and Kami Ramen Bar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jorge Melgoza-Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3225
Petitioner:
JORGE HUMBERTO MELGOZA-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Davis et al v. Sunrise Transportation Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Patricia Davis and Tattiauna Davis
Defendant:
Sunrise Transportation Express, Inc. and Jose Miguel Martinez Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Mauricio Valois-PerezIn re: Mauricio Valois-Perez
as 24-3181
Petitioner:
In re: MAURICIO EDMUNDO VALOIS-PEREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
