Cases 41 - 50 of 1,167
Enochs v. Bocknak et al
as 1:2023cv14811
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debrante Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Haine, A. Bocknak, F. Byndum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate-Hernandez v. Maldonaldo et al
as 4:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
LUIS ZARATE-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
LUIS PEREZ MALDONALDO, BARR-NUNN TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Luis Perez Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Stewart v. Szul et al
as 1:2023cv15969
Plaintiff:
Wynton P. Steward and Wynton P Stewart
Defendant:
R. Szul, G. Perez 03, C. Deanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ladewig v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Michael William Ladewig
Defendant:
Amanda Perez, Dr Phillip Wheatley, Bryan Royce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. GoBrands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13863
Plaintiff:
Octavio Perez
Defendant:
GoBrands, Inc. and GB Logistics, LLC
Juana Alonzo-Perez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3146
Petitioner:
JUANA ALONZO-PEREZ and JUANA ALONZO-ALONZO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
PEREZ v. PRETORIOUS et al
as 1:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
PATRICIA PRETORIOUS, CHAD PLATT and KEITH HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
