Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perez v Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05008
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Karie Rainer, Traci Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinsale Insurance Company v. Delgado et al
as 2:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Kinsale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Julio Delgado, Brenda Delgado, JD Garcia Construction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Perez v. Crosely et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Hector Ahumada Perez
Defendant:
Eric Crosely and Cody Mumaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Clervrain et al v. Cera et al
as 3:2022cv05239
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Kim Wayman Cera, Tina Podlodowski, David Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain Perez v. GEICO Secure Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv05145
Plaintiff:
Dejuan R Cain Perez
Defendant:
GEICO Secure Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
