Cases 41 - 50 of 400
Pearson v. Barwick et al
as 1:2022cv05093
Petitioner:
Dennis M Pearson
Respondent:
John Barwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02177
Plaintiff:
Lenda Pearson
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MICKLES v. PARKER et al
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
NGHIA PARKER, PATRICE POWELL, BRITTANY HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stewart, Timothy v. Thompson, Cherie et al
as 3:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Cherie L. Thompson, Andrew P. Banks, Lt. Blazer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Arndt, Jim et al
as 3:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Jim Arndt, Andrew P. Banks, Monetta Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Banks, Andrew et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew P. Banks, Ofc. John Doe #1, Ofc. John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Banks, Andrew et al
as 3:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew P. Banks, Ronald Sutherland, Jim Ardnt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Garza v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 22-2440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL GARZA
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., ALICIA PEARSON, Nurse, TAMMY WILSON, Healthcare Administrator, Danville Correctional Center and others
PEARSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06858
Plaintiff:
CHERISSE M. PEARSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
