Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Bey v. Kenny et al.
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson Bey
Defendant:
Michael Kenny, Marisha Cornisha, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Peterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Blake Peterson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson v. Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Helen Peterson
Defendant:
Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Peterson v. Obert et al.
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Magistrate Lisa Obert, Bailiff Jim, Priest Dominic Coletta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Landhandle
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kasey Landhandle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00418
Petitioner:
Deon Peterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Peterson v. School et al.
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Police Officer Mark School and Police Officer Zachary Reiland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Angela Peterson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
