Cases 1 - 10 of 44
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01840
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MILLER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY d/b/a ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ORLANDO HARPER, C.L. PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
CLARK v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR CLARK
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY doing business as ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ORLANDO L. HARPER, JASON BEASOM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BREWER v. SHEA et al
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
DONTE BREWER
Defendant:
K. SHEA, LIEUTENANT ROHAL, SERGEANT PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS et al v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv01573
Plaintiff:
JANIIS MATHIS and LAWRENCE MICHAELS
Defendant:
JOHN CARNEY, CLAIRE DEMATTE, PERRY PHELPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
IRIZARRY v. S.C.I. PHOENIX et al
as 2:2021cv04630
Petitioner:
D. JOEL IRIZARRY
Respondent:
S.C.I. PHOENIX and C.O. NORMA TILSON-PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. HARRY et al
as 2:2020cv02016
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Petitioner:
SAMUEL L. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez-Rivera v. Harper et al
as 1:2020cv02257
Defendant:
W. Dreibelbis, John Doe (2), John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Perez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
