Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Stapp v. Elizabethton Police Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. STAPP and Timothy D Stapp
Defendant:
ELIZABETHTON POLICE DEPT., Carter County Sheriff's Office, E.P.D. SGT. CURTIS L. BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Hardeman Co., TN, Gov.
as 1:2021cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jackie Kelley, Cody Naylor, Toni Pierce and others
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Tennessee, Government and Jimmy Sain
Pierce v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00192
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Hunter Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Ford Motor Company (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Bailey, Mary Mcknatt, Lana Rymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hoogland v. City of Maryville, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 3:2019cv00383
Defendant:
Deputy Justin Beckman, Matthew Watson, Scott Spicer and others
Plaintiff:
Theresa Hoogland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2019cv01183
Not Yet Classified:
Kathy Blount
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Linda Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Genovese
as 3:2019cv00352
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Petitioner:
Narrell Christopher Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stein v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Max Fuller, US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC., Jason Grear and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS STEIN, Charles Clowdis and Bryan K. Robbins
Petitioner:
Excavators Union Local 731 Pension Fund and Deirdre Terry
Intervenor Plaintiff:
CARLOS GARCIA and USX INVESTOR GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
