Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Hendry et al v. Lake County, Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Craig Hendry and Tyler Pierce
Defendant:
Lake County, Indiana, Lake County Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Joseph Kraus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAMMON vs CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GAMMON
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and KENNETH PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Zantac Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pierce
Defendant:
Zantac Corporation, Family Dollar, Sanofi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
SHI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
XIAOLONG SHI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA, INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPENCE v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2021cv03012
Plaintiff:
ROBIN SPENCE
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, MCCLANE, GRAM DENNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TYSON v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 1:2019cv03389
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW CASTLE, Henry County IN, NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL CURTIS HILL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
