Cases 1 - 10 of 415
Robertson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rashaad Robertson
Respondent:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rashaad Robertson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH
as 2:2024cv01488
Petitioner:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Respondent:
JACQUELYN E. PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
as 2:2024cv02067
Petitioner:
Wesley M Robertson
Defendant:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. David Paul
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mykael Robertson v. T. Rule
as 23-3080
Petitioner / Appellant:
MYKAEL ROBERTSON
Respondent / Appellee:
T. RULE, Warden
Andre Love v. J. Robertson
as 23-55660
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRE TERIAL LOVE
Respondent / Appellee:
J. M. ROBERTSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
