Cases 11 - 20 of 1,157
McGinnis et al v. Newrez Mortgage et al
as 3:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
John E McGinnis and Paula K McGinnins
Defendant:
Newrez Mortgage, Robertson, Anshutz, Shneid, Crane, and Partners, LLC, Shellpoint LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robertson v Allen
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Carl W Robertson
Defendant:
Lynn Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Guteriz
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Robertson
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and David Guteriz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson and Keith Wayne Robertson
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and Asst Warden Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard v. Robertson et al
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Olize Richard
Defendant:
Tyler Robertson, Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robertson v. East et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson
Defendant:
Jean Ann East, H Lynn Jones, III, Shelby Wambsgans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Blaydes et al
as 6:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Megan T. Blaydes, Frank R. Blaydes, IV and Michael Brewer
Claimant:
Robertson County, Texas, City of Calvert, Calvert Independent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
