Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Scarcella v. Misuraca et al
as 1:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scarcella
Defendant:
Mark Misuraca, Village of Coxsackie, Village of Coxsackie Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Office of Mental Health
as 9:2021cv01026
Petitioner:
Carman Robertson
Respondent:
Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00318
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lynn Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robertson v. Director
as 9:2020cv01405
Petitioner:
Carman Robertson
Respondent:
Hutchings Psychiatric Hospital and Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00996
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ivee Marcella Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. La Touraine LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00595
Defendant:
Accor Services US, LLC, Accor Business and Leisure Management, LLC, Accor Management US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Judith P. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cipolla-Dennis v. County of Tompkins et al
as 3:2018cv01241
Defendant:
Michael Lane, Martha Robertson, County of Tompkins and others
Plaintiff:
Joanne Cipolla-Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. State of Missouri et al
as 9:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robertson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Board of Probation and Parole and Nathan Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00986
Plaintiff:
Ivee Marcella Robertson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robertson v. Department of Social Services
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Brian Robertson
Defendant:
Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
