Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kopack v. Landline Trans, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Natalie Kopack
Defendant:
Landline Transportation, LLC, Tamas Rosenberger and Landline Trans LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Macchia v. Landline Trans, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
jeffrey macchia and Jeffery Macchia
Defendant:
Landline Trans, LLC and Tamas Rosenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, JUDITH PROFFITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenberg v. USA
as 2:2016cv00027
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Linda Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILDE v. ROSENBERG et al
as 1:2015cv01051
Defendant:
JAMES ALOISIO, CALLNET CALL CENTER SERVICES INC., CRAIG DENISON and others
Plaintiff:
SHELLA WILDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Casperson et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01032
Plaintiff:
Mary Lynne Casperson and Kenneth Rosenberger
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEELE v. ROSENBERG et al
as 1:2013cv01073
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOHN DOE and DANIEL ROSENBERG
Plaintiff:
JERRY STEELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosenberg v. Biomet LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00706
Defendant:
Biomet LLC, Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Plaintiff:
sharon rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Rosenberg
as 2:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dr Linda Rosenberg, Highland Open MRI , Lakeside Surgery Center and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
