Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Skyland Oaks Inc et al v. Jack L Witt et al
as 5:2008cv00400
Plaintiff:
Skyland Oaks Inc, Hardy Kruger and Anita Kruger
Defendant:
Jack L Witt, Janith E Johnson, Robin Rodarte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TANNER
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. TANNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Tanner et al
as 5:2007cv04118
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Elmer L Tanner, Wretha Tanner and Nancy Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Tanner v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv04990
Plaintiff:
Valencia Tanner, Valencia Tanner and Valencia Tanner
Defendant:
United States of America, Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District, Board of Commissioners of the East Jefferson Levee District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
BENHASE HOLDINGS, LLC v. TANNERS CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 4:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
BENHASE HOLDINGS, LLC and BENHASE HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
TANNERS CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Third Party Defendant:
Lehner, Hocker & Lehner, P.C., n/k/a Wood & Lamping, LLP, Lehner, Hocker & Lehner, P.C., n/k/a Wood & Lamping, LLP and Lawyers Title of Cincinnati, Inc.
Third Party Plaintiff:
TANNERS CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC
Cross Claimant:
TANNERS CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC, Lawyers Title of Cincinnati, Inc. and Lawyers Title of Cincinnati, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Lehner, Hocker & Lehner, P.C., n/k/a Wood & Lamping, LLP and Lehner, Hocker & Lehner, P.C., n/k/a Wood & Lamping, LLP
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
United States of America v. Tanner
as 3:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danny Lee Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
