Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tanner v. Naqui et al
as 3:2020cv01494
Defendant: Kirsten Shea, Omprakash Pillai and Sayed Naqui
Plaintiff: Thomas Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Cuevas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01432
Defendant: Frankie Cuevas and A. Duffy
Plaintiff: Thomas Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kouloganes v. Mulvihill et al
as 3:2018cv01831
Defendant: Michael A. Mulvihill, Jr, Michael A. Spera, Allyson Tanner and others
Plaintiff: David D. Kouloganes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kouloganes v. Mulvihill et al
as 3:2018cv01821
Defendant: Police Officer Ryan P Walsh, Police Officer Michael A Mulvihill, Jr, Police Officer William Oconnor and others
Plaintiff: David D Kouloganes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
v. Kouloganes et al
as 3:2018cv01813
Defendant: Michael A Spera, William Oconnor, Allyson Tanner and others
Undetermined: David D Kouloganes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Lightner et al
as 3:2017cv00691
Plaintiff: Thomas Tanner
Defendant: Racheal Lightner, Omprakash Pillia, Kevin McCrystal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Ohio
as 3:2013cv00111
Petitioner: Desiree Tanner
Respondent: State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parks v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01162
Plaintiff: William A. Parks
Defendant: USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009mc00246
Plaintiff: William A. Parks
Defendant: USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?