Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 105
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant: JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Smous et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff: Demarcus Morton
Defendant: Wade Smous, Antonio Rodriguez and Andrew A Krumwied
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00290
Petitioner: WADE L. WALKER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
Wade v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff: Teresa Wade
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WADE v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff: TYROME WADE
Defendant: DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GATES v. WILKERSON et al
as 1:2022cv01968
Plaintiff: JOHN GATES
Defendant: JOSIAH WILKERSON, ALESHA BURREGE and JENNIFER WADE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GATES v. WILKERSON et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff: JOHN GATES
Defendant: JOSIAH WILKERSON and JENNIFER L. WADE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Wallace
as 3:2022cv00703
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Nichols
Defendant: Wade A Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?