Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Watkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carlton Watkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Watkins v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Rita Dotson Watkins
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Debra Brine, Honorable Lindsay Tate Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Watkins v. Hale
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
GeneDeShawn M. Watkins
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watkins v. Swaney
as 6:2022cv00236
Petitioner:
Carl Ravon Watkins
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney and G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruffin v. Crews et al
as 5:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ruffin
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Warden Scott Jordan, Caleb Alverio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Bullitt County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Karen Renee Lawrence
Defendant:
Bullitt County, Kentucky, Paul Watkins, Brista Lea Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Whas II
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Gene DeShawn M. Watkins
Defendant:
Whas II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watkins v. Gomez
as 6:2021cv00189
Petitioner:
Lavares Detroen Watkins
Respondent:
Warden C. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00083
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Banks, Candice Banks, Jackie Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Minix v. Dials et al
as 7:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
Marcus S. Minix, Sr.
Defendant:
Timothy Dials, Erin M. Bravo, Thomas W. Watkins, OD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
