Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Glenn #188376 v. Ionia Bellamy Creek Security Classification Committee et al
as 1:2026cv01579
Plaintiff:
Myron C. Glenn #188376, Jr.
Defendant:
Ionia Bellamy Creek Security Classification Committee, Unknown Harrison, Unknown Buchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Aspire Law Group, PLLC
as 2:2026cv11491
Plaintiff:
Shelby Harrison
Defendant:
Aspire Law Group, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Harrison v. Washington
as 2:2026cv10461
Respondent:
Heidi E Washington
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Harrison [E-filer]
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Harrison v. Trump et al
as 2:2026cv10032
Plaintiff:
Dea'Shawn Harrison
Defendant:
Donald Trump, US Attorney General and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Harrison v. Grosch
as 2:2025cv13573
Plaintiff:
Dea'shawn Victor Harrison
Defendant:
Alison Grosch
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jones v. Bitler et al
as 2:2025cv13308
Plaintiff:
Arthur Louis Jones
Defendant:
J. Bitler, M. Oaks and Harrison
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv12086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Harrison #156814 v. Douglas
as 1:2025cv00678
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Harrison #156814
Defendant:
Unknown Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00566
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Harrison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Hakim et al v. Regents of the University of Michigan et al
as 2:2025cv11265
Plaintiff:
Zainab Hakim, Henry MacKeen-Shapiro, Eaman Ali and others
Defendant:
Regents of the University of Michigan, Santa Ono, Geoffrey Chatas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
