Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 43,049
ELSAW v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv03658
Plaintiff: MOHAMED ELSAW
Defendant: MERRICK B GARLAND, Connie Nolan, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02170
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PANDYA v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01321
Plaintiff: HARDIK ARUNKUMAR PANDYA
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JENNIFER B. HIGGINS and TED H. KIM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Triple B Corporation v. Caer Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff: Triple B Corporation a Washington Corporation doing business as Charlie's Produce
Defendant: Caer Inc a Delaware Corporation doing business as Yumi, Angela Sutherland and Evely Rusli
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC
as 24-1427
Plaintiff: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH EQUITY SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a Commonwealth Financial Network
Interested Party: FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC.
Bannikov v. Garland
as 24-1202
Petitioner: PAVEL BANNIKOV, NIKOLAI BANNIKOV, LIUBOV BANNIKOVA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sava v. Garland
as 24-1192
Petitioner: PAMELA SAVA, SALAJAN SAVA and DAVID SAVA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Manasse Abbanga Rimtobaye v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1773
Petitioner: MANASSE ABBANGA RIMTOBAYE
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Juan Leon Mejia v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1948
Petitioner: Juan Rufino Leon Mejia
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Segovia-Coreas v. Garland
as 24-2823
Petitioner: DARWIN ALEXANDER SEGOVIA-COREAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?