Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Harleysville Insurance Company v. Lopez, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00831
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lopez, LLC and Garibaldi's Mexican Restaurant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANCOCK BANK v. HARBORWALK LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
HANCOCK BANK
Defendant:
HARBORWALK LLC , PETER H BOS , LARRY E REEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schambeau Properties, LP v. Waffle House, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Schambeau Properties, LP
Defendant:
Waffle House, Inc. , Sonic Restaurants, Inc. and Alabama Sound Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOUTH HILLS VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LP v. SELECT RESTAURANTS, INC
as 2:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
SOUTH HILLS VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LP
Defendant:
SELECT RESTAURANTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Navigato v. SJ Restaurants, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv02101
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Navigato
Defendant:
SJ Restaurants, LLC, Table Rock Restaurants, LLC, Ozark Restaurants, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Morelli et al v. Morelli et al
as 3:2007cv00330
Plaintiff:
Enrico Morelli and Paul Morelli
Defendant:
Charlotte Morelli, Vicki Plummer, The Pia Family Trust A and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
WESTLAND GARDEN STATE PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. BBRG PARAMUS RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 2:2007cv02491
Plaintiff:
WESTLAND GARDEN STATE PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
BBRG PARAMUS RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Frisch's Restaurants, Inc. et al v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
Frisch's Restaurants, Inc., Frisch's Restaurants, Inc., Mona M. Thomas and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Hudson Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
