Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Under Armour, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00890
Defendant:
Under Armour, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Armour v. Penell
as 3:2019cv02325
Defendant:
John Penell
Plaintiff:
Devin Armour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Ohio, ex rel, et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00120
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, National Foam, Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel. Michael Dewine Ohio Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nice v. Velez et al
as 1:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Sgt. Kathryn Bieber, Armour, Warden Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Nice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nice v. Velez et al
as 1:2016cv02405
Defendant:
Velez, John and Jane Does 1-3, John and Jane Does 11-13 and others
Plaintiff:
Nice and Kayla Nice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armour v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20957
Plaintiff:
Caron H. Armour
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armour v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Virginia Armour
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lightborne Publishing, Inc. v. Citizens for Community Values et al
as 1:2008cv00464
Plaintiff:
Lightborne Publishing, Inc., Lightborne Publishing, Inc. and Lightborne Publishing, Inc.
Defendant:
Citizens for Community Values, Phil Burress, Simon Leis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armour v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co.
as 1:2007cv01025
Plaintiff:
Sandra A. Armour
Defendant:
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
