Cases 31 - 40 of 1,495
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Alphonso F Brown
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brown v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Alphonso F Brown
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tep v. Bey
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Tep
Defendant:
Twana Brown Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Browne v. Cane
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Zachary Russo Browne
Defendant:
Dr. James H. Cane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Erick Brown, Joshua M. Branch, Angela D. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Virginia State University et al
as 3:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Bridgett P. Robertson
Defendant:
Virginia State University, Makola M. Abdullah, Ph.D., Tia A. Minnis, Ph.D and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
