Cases 1 - 10 of 242,804
Garner v. SVSP Warden et al
as 3:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Randall James Garner
Defendant:
SVSP Warden and C/O M. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
HOSKINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05911
Plaintiff:
ALLANA C HOSKINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rutherford v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65459
Plaintiff:
Nick C Rutherford
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gallegos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
Diane C. Gallegos
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sergent v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sergent
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kobuta v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Michael Kobuta
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hosford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02235
Plaintiff:
James Hosford
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fontenot v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fontenot
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jordan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02248
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Jordan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
