Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Charging Crow v. Morgan et al
as 4:2023cv04200
Plaintiff:
Delbert W. Charging Crow, Jr.
Defendant:
Felicia Morgan, Sgt. Rower, Cassandra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaff et al v. Claymore et al
as 3:2023cv03029
Plaintiff:
Sarah Shaff and Keith Fodness
Defendant:
Judge Brenda Claymore, Judge Margaret Egan and Charles Red Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Steele v. Charging Crow et al
as 5:2022cv05035
Plaintiff:
Tina Steele
Defendant:
Naca Charging Crow, John Pettigrew and Tyler Rojo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Iron Crow v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv05065
Plaintiff:
Marlon Dean Iron Crow, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Whalen v. Oglala Sioux Tribe Executive Officers et al
as 5:2020cv05070
Defendant:
Oglala Sioux Tribe Executive Officers, Mason Big Crow, Chancy Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Cleone Whalen
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Crow v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 5:2020cv05015
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company and Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Rex Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holoubek v. Native American Telecom, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv04155
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Holoubek
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, Oglala Sioux Tribe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Iron Crow v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv05037
Plaintiff:
Marlee Iron Crow
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Crow Creek Tribe of South Dakota v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 1:2018cv01010
Plaintiff:
Crow Creek Tribe of South Dakota
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai, Michael O'Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Big Crow v. Stanley
as 5:2016cv05082
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Marie Big Crow
Defendant:
Gary Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
