Cases 1 - 10 of 78
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, GARDENER, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. FINCH et al
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
HECTOR FLORES, JR.
Defendant:
FINCH and HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YEANAY v. BRANHAN et al
as 1:2023cv01948
Plaintiff:
MARKUS YEANAY
Defendant:
D. BRANHAN, C. SWEASON, III, ISSAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barr et al v. St. John, The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Robert Barr and Laura Barr
Defendant:
Town of St. John, Indiana, Town of St. John, Police Department, Steven Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. East Chicago City of et al
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Eriberto Flores
Defendant:
East Chicago City of, East Chicago Police Department, Hector Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk, Allman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ FLORES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
ROSA M DIAZ FLORES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
FLORES v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00359
Petitioner:
JAVIER FLORES
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
