Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Carver et al v. Talanca et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Anita Carver and Richard Carver
Defendant:
Jeremy Talanca, Brandon Gonzalez and Mayor Judith L. Mehlbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godlewski v. Alvear Gonzalez, et al.
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Philip Godlewski
Defendant:
Eduardo Nicolas Alvear Gonzalez, Good Lion Films, L.L.C. and Good Lion TV, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Gonzalez v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Julius Gonzalez
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Jesus Dejesus Gonzalez
Defendant:
J. Franklin and SUPERINTENDENT Ramson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv01309
Petitioner:
Camilo Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luntz v. Hileman et al
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Derek Luntz
Defendant:
Katy Hileman, Monica Goss, Unknown Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. SREBRO et al
as 1:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Ms. C. Srebro, L. Harry, Keri Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01883
Petitioner:
Fernando Gonzalez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant:
B. Salamon, Michael Rowe, Richard Ellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Spaulding
as 4:2022cv01663
Petitioner:
Prospero Gonzalez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
