Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Jones et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02488
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones, Ellen D Dotson, Cheryl B Manning and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grogan v. City of Port Arthur Police Dept et al
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Michael D Grogan
Defendant:
City of Port Arthur Police Dept, TML Insurance Adjuster and Jeff Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grogan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Fredrick Wayne Grogan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grogan v. EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv03618
Plaintiff:
Tara Grogan
Defendant:
EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC, EasyKnock, Inc. and LendingOne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Scheaffer v. Albertson's LLC et al
as 4:2021cv02326
Plaintiff:
Steven Scheaffer
Defendant:
Albertson's LLC, Albertsons Companies, LLC, Safeway Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grogan v. Gettler
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Kelly Grogan
Defendant:
Robert Gettler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Witcher v. Thompkins et al
as 1:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Brenda Grogan, Arron Thompkins, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Demontrous Witcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grogan v. Seaboard Marine, Ltd., Inc.
as 4:2020cv03337
Plaintiff:
Michael Grogan
Defendant:
Seaboard Marine, Ltd., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2020cv03237
Plaintiff:
Michael Grogan and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Seaboard Marine Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Brooks v. Taylor County et al
as 1:2020cv00049
Defendant:
Wesley Spells, Cleston Cronk, Jailer Laura and others
Plaintiff:
Chandler Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
