Cases 31 - 40 of 1,317
Crandle v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
James Dlester Crandle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Capt. Surles, Lt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Vallely
as 1:2023cv00386
Counter Defendant:
H. Reid Key
Plaintiff:
Kristen F. Key
Defendant:
Chantelle S. Vallely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Smith v. Blair Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Terry H Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Blair Logistics LLC and Blair Leasing and Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Clark et al v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Judson H. Clark, Jr. and Mattie L. Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Reed v. Norton et al
as 4:2023cv01240
Petitioner:
Paul H Reed, II
Respondent:
Jonathan W Norton and 16th Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Headley et al
as 1:2023cv01218
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Joseph H Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Echenique v. Biden et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00534
Defendant:
Lamela Solomon, Julian Lennon, Joe Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Ivette T. Echenique
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gibson et al v. Kittrick
as 2:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
James H Gibson and Lena M Gibson
Defendant:
Cristie Lee Kittrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
