Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jeffers v. Hanson & Adkins Transport, Inc et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jeffers
Defendant:
Hanson & Adkins Transport, Inc and Larry M Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanson v. USA
as 3:2021cv00390
Petitioner:
John William Hanson, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maxey v. Harris et al (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Samuel McCall, Jr., Santa Rosa Jr. College, Richard Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hohenberg et al v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv02432
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, City of Memphis, Tennessee and Division 14 of the Shelby County, Tennessee, General Sessions Court, Criminal Division
Plaintiff:
Sarah Hohenberg and Joseph Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Shane Hanson, Cheatham County, Tennessee, Michael Breedlove and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Baker and Jariel Kling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
John William Hanson and John William Hanson, III
Defendant:
Dylan Jones, United States of America, National Park Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Petrocelli v. Hanson
as 3:2018cv00473
Plaintiff:
John Petrocelli
Defendant:
Rodney Douglas Hanson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melvin et al v. City of Chattanooga et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Hanson Melvin and Tarah Melvin
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , David Campbell and John Doe Officers 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Wissing et al (TV3)
as 4:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
William C. Bryan
Defendant:
Jeromey Wissing and Greg Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
