Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Sunrise Carrier, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Laney Shirley
Defendant:
Sunrise Carrier, Inc. and Harman Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harman v. Cerebral, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harman
Defendant:
Cerebral, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Neal v. Harman
as 1:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dai'Shawn M. Neal
Defendant:
Lt. Harman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
XI Chi Clan Nation et al v. Barry, et al.
as 3:2020cv00739
Respondent:
Justin L. Krik, Esq., Bank of America, Office of the Sheriff and others
Claimant:
Guale Yamassee Juris Consul Office, Be Kind and Unified Foreign Private Family Indigenous Trust, Guale Yamassee Compliance Department and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Woodfin v. Gregory et al
as 1:2020cv01027
Defendant:
Chief Felton, Jesse Woods, Capt. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Archie L. Woodfin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parshall v. Virginia Partners Bank et al
as 3:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Virginia Partners Bank, Steven R Mote, Delmar Bancorp and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Harman v. Berryhill
as 7:2019cv00071
Plaintiff:
George McKinley Harman
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
