Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hedgpeth v. Friendship Village Tempe
as 2:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hedgpeth
Defendant:
Friendship Village Tempe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jonathan Hedgpeth v. Ammar Rahim, et al
as 16-7146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Hedgpeth
Defendant - Appellee:
Ammar Rahim, District of Columbia Police Officer, individually and in his official capacity and Rider, DC Police Officer, individually and in his official capacity
HEDGPETH v. RAHIM et al
as 1:2015cv01228
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HEDGPETH
Defendant:
AMMAR RAHIM and RIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Brown et al
as 1:2014at00809
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Jeffrey A. Beard, Matthew L. Cate and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Ager v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 14-15662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL AGER, individually and as Successor in Interest to the Estate of Alan Ager, Kathryn Ager and Elizabeth Ager
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, B. HENDRICKS, D. SPENCER and others
Elissa Rubenstein v. Whittier Police Department Officer Nyberg et al
as 2:2014cv01222
Defendant:
Officer Becker, Officer Bolanos, Officer Cheng and others
Plaintiff:
Elissa Rubenstein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wagster v. Village of Sauget et al
as 3:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bobby G. Wagster, Jr.
Defendant:
Village of Sauget, Village of Sauget, Scott Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James Smith v. Hedgpeth, et al
as 08-16544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
HEDGPETH, Warden and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Adam Martin, et al v. Brian Phillips, et al
as 08-2112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADAM MARTIN and KENNETH PICKARD
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN PHILLIPS, JEFF DONAHEY and SCOTT HEDGPETH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
