Cases 1 - 10 of 1,790
Sharifi v. Henderson
as 1:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
Nazifa Kristina Sharifi
Defendant:
Cheryl Jackson Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Tavarres Henderson and Juhiiv Ali Muhammed
Respondent:
Mr Terry Bernard
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent:
TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Pettway
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Betty Henderson
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Pettway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD, et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD and TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. CARR
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. SRS Nuclear Power et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
SRS Nuclear Power and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bernard et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
Mr Terry Bernard and State of Georgia Pardons & Paroles Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11482
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HENDERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
