Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Mott
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Carrie Ash Mott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Preston Kekuma Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hernandez v. Carpenter
as 2:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Respondent:
Eric Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vick v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2023cv06197
Plaintiff:
John E Vick
Defendant:
Tony Hernandez, Alexandria Hunter, Keanu Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Annu El v. Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Zebelum Anna El, Zebelum Willis and Zebelum Annu El
Defendant:
Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic and Sandy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2023cv00327
Petitioner:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Amaya Hernandez v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Jose Ernesto Amaya Hernandez
Defendant:
Interstate Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
