Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Hughey v. Wagner et al
as 6:2023cv06270
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hughey
Defendant:
William J. Wagner, Nicholas M. Adams, Connor Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Ramirez-Torres v. Highberger
as 6:2021cv01722
Plaintiff:
Jaime Ramirez-Torres
Defendant:
Josh Highberger, J. Wagner and Officer Laugenour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Defendant:
Krysta Lynch, Oregon Department of Corrections, L. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dailey v. Galloway, et al
as 8:2020cv01731
Defendant:
Robert G. Fegers, Captain Galloway, Deputy Jameson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dailey v. Galloway et al
as 8:2020cv01505
Defendant:
Lieutenant Hogen, Captain Galloway, J. Wagner and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Dailey and Daniel L. Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucius v. Judd et al
as 8:2019cv02767
Defendant:
J. Seiler, J. Nabors, L. Houghton and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Allen Lucius, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv01179
Defendant:
Lt John Doe, John Baldwin, Frank Lawrence and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Walker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
