Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ramsfield v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
Lane Ramsfield
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03758
Plaintiff:
Tonette Lane
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Dolman et al.
as 5:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
William Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Dolman, Deputy Russ, Deputy Dale Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Husband v. Lane et al.
as 2:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Louis R Husband
Defendant:
Daniel Lane, Kevin F. Chamblin, Norm Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Poole et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
John Lane, Heather Michelle Poole and David Carawon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ludwick v. Teague et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Ludwick
Defendant:
Capt. Brandon Teague, C.O. Nathan Rook, C.O. Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
