Cases 81 - 90 of 215
MANN v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv00394
Petitioner:
LOUIS MICHAEL MANN
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mann et al v. Palmerton Area School District et al
as 3:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mann and Rose Mann
Defendant:
Palmerton Area School District , Palmerton Area School District Board of Education , Palmerton Area High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Holt et al
as 3:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Francois Holloway
Defendant:
Ronnie Holt and Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAY v. TORRES et al
as 2:2013cv07406
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MAY
Defendant:
TORRES , CYRUS MANN , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARMAN v. AMBRIDGE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2013cv01726
Plaintiff:
PAUL WILLIAM CARMAN
Defendant:
AMBRIDGE BOROUGH, MAYOR RICHIE D'AMBROSIO, AMBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Mann et al
as 3:2013cv02771
Plaintiff:
Brian C Moore
Defendant:
Angela D Mann, Renee Foulds, Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF HASSAN PRATT v. DAWES et al
as 2:2013cv03162
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF HASSAN PRATT and MICHAEL DAWES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CYRUS MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Carter et al
as 1:2013cv01215
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas Manning
Defendant:
Gary Carter, Glenn Manns, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. United States Of America
as 1:2013cv01032
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Mann
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KBZ COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CBE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02011
Plaintiff:
KBZ COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CBE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, JOHN MANN, BRENDA BARROWCLOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
