Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Plaintiff I.P. v. Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: Plaintiff I.P.
Defendant: Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Suboxone (Buprenorphine/Naloxone) Film Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2024md03092
Defendant: Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs Executive Committee and Plaintiffs Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alexandra Yonkov v. Maximus Holding Group LLC, et al
as 24-3056
Plaintiff: ALEXANDRA YONKOV, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Maximus Holding Group LLC
Defendant: MAXIMUS HOLDING GROUP LLC, BRICKHAUS MANAGEMENT, INC., ANDREW E. BRICKMAN and others
Daretha Braziel, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee: DARETHA BRAZIEL, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of RB, next friend of DB, next friend of DR, KEESHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of KJ, next friend of DJ, next friend of TC, next friend of KB, IEASHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan and others
Defendant: GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, iindividually and in her official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, LIESL CLARK, Director, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARCUS MUHAMMAD, Mayor, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL O'MALLEY, Water Plant Operator, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, a Municipal Corporation, through the Benton Harbor Water Department
Frank Savel v. MetroHealth System
as 23-3672
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANK SAVEL, (Named Plaintiff 1) and Named Plaintiffs 2-46, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: METROHEALTH SYSTEM
Andrei Fenner, et al v. General Motors, LLC, et al
as 23-1698
Plaintiff: ANDREI FENNER
Plaintiff / Appellant: PANTEL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Andrei Fenner, et al v. General Motors, LLC, et al
as 23-1696
Plaintiff: ANDREI FENNER
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDERTON PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Andrei Fenner, et al v. General Motors, LLC, et al
as 23-1697
Plaintiff: ANDREI FENNER
Plaintiff / Appellant: BULAON PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant: TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
Chris Davis v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1345
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRIS LENELL DAVIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; 15 other plaintiffs named but did not sign complaint
Defendant / Appellee: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, in her Official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, MIKE BROWN, in his Official capacity as Warden of Kinross Correctional Facility, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?