Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Dunbar v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv07703
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, Sergeant J. Calegari, Deputy Sheriff at Santa Rita County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lamar Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penny v. Alameda County et al
as 3:2019cv06981
Defendant:
Alameda County and Deputy J. Pereira
Plaintiff:
Louis Levern Penny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Pereira
as 3:2018cv06266
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Rich
Defendant:
J. Pereira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELTON v. PEREIRA et al
as 5:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEVON BELTON
Defendant:
JOSE PEREIRA, SCOTT CLINES, WILLIAM STONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Shank v. Corizon Health Services, et al
as 16-16773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JEROLD SHANK
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Health Services Provider at A.S.P.C. Florence - East Unit, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES INCORPORATED, Health Services Provider at Arizona Dept. of Corrections, CHARLES L. RYAN, Director at Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Overturf v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02301
Plaintiff:
George Wilson Overturf
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Christine Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pereira v. Department of Corrections
as 4:2015cv03300
Plaintiff:
Iris Pereira
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv02226
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Christopher Johnson, Unknown McGary, Cynthia Ripsin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREIRA v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
IRIS PEREIRA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Gregory Fizer, Stephen Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
