Cases 1 - 10 of 166
HEATH v. HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv01836
Defendant:
RALPH WATSON, JENNIFER ARMSTRONG and HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
TROY M. HEATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. AZO Services PIA LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00842
Defendant:
Ralph Balkema, Michael Balkema, Aggregate Resources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Woodward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Goldman v. Goldman et al
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Goldman
Defendant:
Tracy A. Coleman, Ricky L. Goldman, Jennifer Irons-Joste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RALPH JR. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. RALPH JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
DOE 4 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE 3 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE 2 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 2
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, 1
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LIFFORD v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. LIFFORD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HERNANDEZ v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
RALPH HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
