Cases 1 - 10 of 26
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 2:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE U.S. MARSHALS, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LEMMONS v. RUDD et al
as 1:2020cv00012
Defendant:
JEREMY LIGHTNER, DAVID RUDD and CHRISTOPHER T. WINGARD
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEENAN LEMMONS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
RUDD v. MEDIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv04881
Plaintiff:
PHILIP STEVEN RUDD
Defendant:
MEDIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN STEVEN MCCORMICK, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. County of York et al
as 1:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jacobs
Defendant:
County of York, Kevin Hoffman, Donald L. Reihart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUDD v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01444
Plaintiff:
BETTY R. RUDD
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Haynes et al
as 1:2015cv00865
Plaintiff:
David M. Wright
Defendant:
Mark A. Haynes, David M. Whitcomb, Daniel H. Graff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Kuhn et al
as 1:2014cv00626
Defendant:
Buono, Clair Doll, McNicholas and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
