Cases 1 - 10 of 1,292
Ralston v. Platypus Marine Inc
as 3:2024cv05343
Plaintiff:
Charles T Ralston
Defendant:
Platypus Marine Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1916 Marine Contract Actions
Fletcher v. Golightly et al
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
Mary Golightly, T Craw and Echos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Amanda Terecia Palmer
Defendant:
Venecia T Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee et al v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Lee and Daniel Lee
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company, Robert Hanley, T-N-T Claims and Consulting Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Ranee T Goodell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Littlefield v. Splawn et al
as 1:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edwin Littlefield
Defendant:
B Splawn, Lt T Irion, Lt E Coxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. State of Washington Department of Children Youth and Families et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Sophie Hartman
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Kelsey Owens, Lauren Maulden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant:
Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
